From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3bf50ede73cff892
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: fjh@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
Subject: Re: Operators Questions
Date: 1996/10/30
Message-ID: <557icu$fc@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 193271563
references: <3275D478.5952@eurocontrol.fr>
organization: Comp Sci, University of Melbourne
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Richard Irvine <Richard.Irvine@eurocontrol.fr> writes:

>Are there languages which do allow defintion of 
>new operators?

Yes.  For example, Prolog and Haskell both allow this.

--
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>   |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>   |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3         |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.