From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,33e793a459e66944 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: olavip@kaarne.cs.tut.fi (Poutanen Olavi) Subject: Re: Choosing C++ instead of Ada Date: 1996/10/28 Message-ID: <551pqf$qmd@peippo.cs.tut.fi>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 192785615 distribution: inet references: <326CF7BC.167E@hso.link.com> <32723CA0.7ED9@lmtas.lmco.com> organization: Testwell nntp-posting-user: olavip newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jim Hopper asked >olavip@kaarne.cs.tut.fi (Poutanen Olavi) writes: > >> You will find there descriptions of TBGEN (a test harnessing tool for unit >> testing) and TCMON (a code coverage/execution profiling tool). There are >> descriptions of some our C/C++ test tools as well... > >Do you support gnat?? Your web page doesnt say. > >jim Haven't tried it (yet). As TBGEN and TCMON are all written in 'vanilla' Ada 83, there should be no special problems with it (unless gnat's unit/file naming conventions bring some work...) - Olavi (http://www.testwell.sci.fi)