From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,33e793a459e66944 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: amd001@its.maynick.com.au (Andrew Dunstan) Subject: Re: Choosing C++ instead of Ada Date: 1996/10/25 Message-ID: <54pqdo$ndr@mippet.ci.com.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 191920244 references: <01bbb6e2$6385d540$23b2fd86@jssmith.csu891.sandia.gov> <326CF7BC.167E@hso.link.com> <326FCA54.167E@lanl.gov> organization: Mayne Nickless Ltd Information Technology Services newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: William Clodius (wclodius@lanl.gov) wrote: : Still I suspect that any reasonable person would agree that the number : of Ada vendors is significantly less thatn the number of C++ vendors. The number of smart people is significantly less than the number of not so smart people. So we should use not so smart programmers because there are lots of tools around for fixing their mistakes, right? Or am I missing something here? :-) cheers andrew -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- There's nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so - Hamlet http://www.gr-lakes.com/~andrew (including PGP key) PGP Key fingerprint = 5C 44 7D E4 76 A3 31 DE 3D 11 FA 15 4D 87 1F 5E -------------------------------------------------------------------------