From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT
	GPL 2009?
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <54839eeb-fe35-49eb-9c67-41a81879f8fd@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<9d86256d-a0f3-4c43-82f9-98bb4641be69@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.57.218
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240851599 29088 127.0.0.1 (27 Apr 2009 16:59:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:59:59 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.70.57.218;
	posting-account=5RIiTwoAAACt_Eu87gmPAJMoMTeMz-rn
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.9)
	Gecko/2009040821 Firefox/3.0.9 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5560
Date: 2009-04-27T09:59:58-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 27, 9:05=A0am, Vadim Godunko <vgodu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The answer depends from another question: did you report this bug to
> AdaCore?

If you can show me where on the site http://libre.adacore.com/ there's
a place to report anything, I'd be pleased to see it. Insofar as I can
tell, AdaCore has no interest in engaging GPL users in any kind of
quality process. There's no way I could see to report defects, much
less any transparency about what might be done about such reports.
Actions speak louder than words, and in this case an absence of action
indicates an absence of interest.