From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,434ab1ecadabe91f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out01a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!xs4all!amsnews11.chello.com!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed02.chello.at!news.hispeed.ch.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <5468592.X6JzA9C5Zd@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: Ada Programming now a featuresd book Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:16:13 +0200 References: <463048e9$1@news.post.ch> <463209bb$1@news.post.ch> User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@hispeed.ch Organization: hispeed.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.73.230.248 (84.73.230.248) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:30:03 +0200 X-Trace: 73bbc4632f7fbf1ec435d24556 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15374 Date: 2007-04-28T09:16:13+02:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote: > Martin Krischik writes: > >> I just found a 2nd advertising entry: Now I wonder which is best: >> >> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Featured_books/Templates >> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Featured_Books/Book2 >> >> or one of other the alternatives from: >> >> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks_talk:Featured_Books/Book2 > > The Featured_books/Templates version is very > flat. I don't think it was an Ada expert who did it. > Wikibooks:Featured_Books/Book2 is better. > I did a minor edit of > Wikibooks_talk:Featured_Books/Book2 option 3, but it might be too > long; option 4 is tempting, too .. I did those two originally - but they where of course changed over time. Well Scheme and Haskel has long texts as well. But option 3 also uses references which is unsuitable for for portal site. Anyway the current version is to flat - for now I linked http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Featured_books/Templates to http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Featured_Books/Book2 but I consider option 4. Just wonder if option 4 is to technical... Again opinions? Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com