From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6d85:: with SMTP id
 i127mr58007214qkc.74.1564052322229;
        Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:da43:: with SMTP id r64mr41189074oig.0.1564052321905;
 Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!b26no887150qtq.0!news-out.google.com!a5ni1819qtd.0!nntp.google.com!b26no887141qtq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <qh9tfu$1hmg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.67.150.46;
 posting-account=XYi0owoAAAC_eOHXu2MQKhBYUNiEUxE2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.67.150.46
References: <qgtdf4$7ej$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <5d9a8728-3c5b-4caf-b765-a455ba4d3523@googlegroups.com>
 <5fb45b9c-d7da-447c-999e-0e8bcce2eed5@googlegroups.com>
 <fd01ab41-6ca8-4550-9943-4e7789df90e4@googlegroups.com>
 <qh9tfu$1hmg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5467cebd-79c3-444c-b28d-a6a217bca0e5@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How to make Ada popular. Get rid of ";" at end of statement.
From: "Ingo M." <announce@amkade.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:58:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56936
Date: 2019-07-25T03:58:41-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 17:29:06 UTC+2 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov:

> It is worse than C/C++. It is largely model-driven design with software 
> written or drawn in the form of diagrams which prevent even C/C++ 
> rudimentary safety checks. Assorted chunks of code generated from 
> diagrams are then piled together into one system.

If that is usual then it should not matter which language the code generator uses to produce the final result. It would not matter if the object code language is C, or C++, or Ada, or whatever. So, why not use a _safe_ language for that?