From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-a.proxad.net!nnrp3-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-1?b?RnLpZOlyaWM=?= Praca <frederic.praca@free.fr>
Subject: Re: F-35 (was:F-22 ADA Programming)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <a510f410-56ea-46a6-9f3c-021a2389b936@googlegroups.com>
	<544dcfe4$0$39507$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com>
	<2014102820495633928-rblove@airmailnet>
	<5451fe52$0$2378$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508
 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 30 Oct 2014 09:07:43 GMT
Message-ID: <5451ffdf$0$2378$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Oct 2014 10:07:43 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.144.202.121
X-Trace: 1414660063 news-1.free.fr 2378 213.144.202.121:51581
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22915
Date: 2014-10-30T10:07:43+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:01:06 +0000, Frédéric Praca wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:49:56 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> 
>> On 2014-10-27 04:53:56 +0000, Jerry Petrey said:
>> 
>> Does anyone have knowledge of how software for the F-35 went?   Budget,
>> schedule and quality?    Was it autocoded from UML or written in the
>> traditonal fashion?  Is there any way to compare software development
>> success between F-22 and F-35?
> 
> Well, you can find several things about that.
> First, on Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II#Program_cost_increases_and_delays ),
> you will learn that software is one of the main actors in the delays.
> 
> More technical information can be found there (https://www.csiac.org/
> sites/default/files/
> 
journal_files/2010_03_30_SoftwareQualityReliabilityandErrorPrediction.pdf
> ) from page 36 to 39.
> One thing linked to the other posts in this thread is the choice of
> C/C++
> for staffing concerns.
> 
> But don't count on me to make the link between software delays and the
> C++ choice :)
> 
> Fred

And I also forgot the latest information I got from CPPCon through these 
slides (http://tinyurl.com/qze7nhh ) but it's only C++ :)

Fred
Ps: sorry for the long URLs. Here are shorter ones that fit in one line
- Wikipedia : http://tinyurl.com/pdrnoax
- CSIAC : http://tinyurl.com/nvglaab