From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Xref: utzoo news.groups:11471 comp.edu:2399 comp.lang.ada:2550 comp.lang.c++:4322 comp.lang.lisp:2015 comp.lang.misc:3255 comp.lang.smalltalk:1261 comp.lang.eiffel:350 comp.sw.components:99 comp.databases:3222 comp.software-eng:1855 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!ajpo!eberard From: eberard@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Edward Berard) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.edu,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.sw.components,comp.databases,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: Formation of comp.object-oriented Keywords: clarifications Message-ID: <544@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 9 Aug 89 12:05:57 GMT List-Id: Folks, Someone was kind enough to send me the "guidelines for the creation of a new newsgroup. I will not reproduce them in their entirety here, but I will present relevant excerpts. These appear to be from "the powers that be." [My comments are contained in square brackets like the ones that enclose this sentence.] --------------------------------- [*** begin excerpts ***] ... "Any group creation request which follows these guidelines to a successful result should be honored, and any request which fails to follow these procedures or to obtain a successful result from doing so should be dropped, except under extraordinary circumstances." ... "It should be pointed out here that, as always, the decision whether or not to create a newsgroup on a given machine rests with the administrator of that machine." ... The Discussion 1) ...the actual discussion [should take] place only in news.groups. Users on sites which have difficulty posting to moderated groups may mail submissions intended for news.announce.newgroups to "announce-newgroups@ncar.ucar.edu". [Some discussion of comp.object-oriented has already taken place on news.groups.] 2) The discussion period should last for at least two weeks (14 days), and no more than 30 days. [This means the "discussion period" should end on, or around August 23, 1989.] 3) The name and charter of the proposed group ... [At present the name is "comp.object-oriented", and my original message, i.e., the "call for discussion" represents a trial charter. However, both are open to debate.] ... and whether it will be moderated or unmoderated (and if the former, who the moderator(s) will be) should be determined during the discussion period. ... [Do you want the group to be moderated? If so, by whom? Any volunteers?] [*** end of excerpts ***] ------------------------------- On, or around, August 23, 1989, assuming all goes well, I will post a formal "call for votes." That message will also include a summary of the voting rules. I will act as the vote collector. Unfortunately, all votes received prior to the formal call for votes, cannot be counted. Feel free to send me e-mail at any time. However, ALL DISCUSSION ON THE POSSIBLE FORMATION OF COMP.OBJECT-ORIENTED SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO news.groups. Thank you for your time and consideration. -- Ed Berard (301) 353-9652