From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,56525db28240414a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.76.162 with SMTP id l2mr1258377paw.42.1343317412274;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.162 with SMTP id i2mr1803325paz.30.1343315678899;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p10ni65138561pbh.1!nntp.google.com!u4no684607pbs.0!news-out.google.com!b9ni65015823pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!novia!feed-C.news.volia.net!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.antakira.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: robin.vowels@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Efficient Sequential Access to Arrays
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 03:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <543da562-a07d-4aba-b46b-11d1d7a90900@googlegroups.com>
References: <01983f1c-f842-4b1f-a180-bcef531dad4c@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.2.70.40
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1342951282 8487 127.0.0.1 (22 Jul 2012 10:01:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <01983f1c-f842-4b1f-a180-bcef531dad4c@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=123.2.70.40;
 posting-account=S_MdrwoAAAD7T2pxG2e393dk6y0tc0Le
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Original-Bytes: 1428
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-07-22T03:01:22-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, 16 July 2012 04:40:08 UTC+10, Keean Schupke  wrote:
> The Monte-Carlo simulator I am working on is now performing better in Ada than in C++ using profile-guided compilation (57k simulations per second for Ada &#39;vs&#39; 56k simulations per second for C++).

One part in 59 is not a significant difference.