From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60973b026c6e423d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) Subject: Re: the term "pound sign" (was: help: character to integer) Date: 1996/10/09 Message-ID: <53gged$oqi@felix.seas.gwu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 188272286 references: <52t8la$2l8@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <3252BEC8.529E@lmco.com> <53blbk$6va@krusty.irvine.com> organization: George Washington University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <53blbk$6va@krusty.irvine.com>, Adam Beneschan wrote: >pound lb or lb avdp also # 16 ounces, 7000 grains 0.454 kilogram >probably indicating that the use of the term "pound sign" for # did >not arise from an accident of the ASCII chart. It seems more likely >to me that the common names for the two symbols led the character-code >designers to give them the same ASCII code, not the other way around. >Anyone have any definitive information that would settle this question >of the utmost importance? Way back in my high school and undergraduate days (hmmm - 1958-66), we routinely used # in physics classes to represent pounds. That was definitely before ASCII. Mike Feldman (gray and aging pedant)