From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:04:47 +0200 From: "G.B." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada platforms and pricing, was: Re: a new language, designed for safety ! References: <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com> <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com> <2100734262424129975.133931laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <5156oy7vhg99.17wu6q2ef45ke.dlg@40tude.net> <1d3612ad-f85a-489c-b4bc-0c23d5d67de3@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <53abf03f$0$6612$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Jun 2014 12:04:47 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: b4d3c5f0.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=_FoYmBD`L0e>jlK2>IgHGd4IUKjLh>_cHTX3jmc:8MA?iI9gj X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187252 Date: 2014-06-26T12:04:47+02:00 List-Id: On 26.06.14 04:50, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote: > When I was using C, I used to implement per‑coroutine stack (with limit > check!, cheese) and stack‑switching for that purpose, but you can't do > it with Ada, as it does not allow this kind of low level hacking. Given that Ada allows hacking at a level lower than C ---address arithmetic is not restricted by the type of offsets, for example---what is it that you have been doing in C that you think cannot be done in Ada?