From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!gegeweb.org!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:48:11 +0200
From: "G.B." <rm-dash-bau-haus@dash.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada platforms and pricing, was: Re: a new language, designed
 for safety !
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <ln6uv9$bk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <b22db9fb-a73d-438a-8cfd-f0bb1db70eed@googlegroups.com>
 <MPElv.491358$1w1.428312@fx03.iad>
 <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com>
 <ln7ngt$c8a$1@dont-email.me>
 <2100734262424129975.133931laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <lnn5ko$ner$1@loke.gir.dk> <lnn8ff$k42$1@dont-email.me>
 <lnq58f$du2$1@loke.gir.dk> <lnsqus$d4j$1@dont-email.me>
 <lntmdq$p1j$1@loke.gir.dk> <lo7c2h$ura$1@dont-email.me>
 <lo7pea$cm3$1@loke.gir.dk> <c0pv51Ff927U1@mid.individual.net>
 <5156oy7vhg99.17wu6q2ef45ke.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <5156oy7vhg99.17wu6q2ef45ke.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <53a813fa$0$6604$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jun 2014 13:48:10 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: cbc6fc79.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=>=1SQ@e77_P=>bdbdS?M0Y4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[;
 A>oBa?RK4Rnc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]DnYm6Ni^h5[
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187193
Date: 2014-06-23T13:48:10+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 23.06.14 09:42, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Wouldn't it be helpful to have user-defined tasking for such cases? Because
> there is another important case for this - co-routines.

Will a

   pragma Passive;

allow reuse of existing implementation efforts (at PC-less tasks)?