From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!gegeweb.org!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:58:02 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bug or feature? References: <50562e0a-3dfa-44c4-9aaa-70cbe304b54b@googlegroups.com> <40c7405d-c4c2-4163-a430-01052b769866@googlegroups.com> <049c868a-e930-4e5d-a96a-611542cd1ce6@googlegroups.com> <224148c3-2a31-4f3e-a3a3-0a588773798b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <5374819a$0$6696$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 May 2014 10:58:02 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: c39ae244.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=9dV@gSoAa_TYQ5E:lZLh>_cHTX3j]776_bTSkHX_ X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de X-Original-Bytes: 1746 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186425 Date: 2014-05-15T10:58:02+02:00 List-Id: On 14/05/14 23:48, Randy Brukardt wrote: > To compile ACATS tests in GNAT, I have to use a small boatload of options: > > gnatmake > C457003.adb -eS -gnat12 -O0 -gnatE -gnato -gnatv -gnatws -gnatd7 -bargs - T0 Would it be meaningful when testing any compiler, to include the optimizers typically used when translating production code? -O2 seems commonly used with GNAT.