From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Subject: <> syntax in generic formal_package_actual_part
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 00:37:10 +0200
Date: 2014-05-09T00:37:10+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536c0716$0$6705$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
Hi,
is a compiler correct in accepting the syntax of these four lines?
Specifically, if the "<>" the sole text in parentheses, I'd find
myself at home. But I'm no longer sure with other associations present.
Should there be an "others =>" before the box?
with Ada.Containers.Vectors;
generic
with package G is new Ada.Containers.Vectors (Integer, Positive, <>);
package Gen_Pak is end Gen_Pak;
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-08 22:37 Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2014-05-08 23:20 ` <> syntax in generic formal_package_actual_part Adam Beneschan
2014-05-09 13:05 ` G.B.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox