From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:52:45 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Oberon and Wirthian languages References: <1ljwj8f.1wqbhvuabsdw1N%csampson@inetworld.net> <8761m535e4.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org> <1zhiqb89npa6$.1z9j4otjchcb.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: <1zhiqb89npa6$.1z9j4otjchcb.dlg@40tude.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <535b65cd$0$6716$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2014 09:52:45 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 62315473.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=2]h^dc@1U[FFJ3]dH>I?oEA9EHlD; 3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA8kFejVHMTBeOK:9T7@4_V8A<; VW\@ X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de X-Original-Bytes: 2166 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186102 Date: 2014-04-26T09:52:45+02:00 List-Id: On 26/04/14 09:36, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > Many lock-free operations require more than merely pragma Atomic, e.g. > compare and swap etc. Would it help if a Suspension_Object were implemented on top of CAS? I understand that everything concurrent can be expressed with the help of consensus protocols, which in turn can be expressed in terms of CAS only.