From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:11:06 +0100
From: "G.B." <rm-dash-bau-haus@dash.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Your wish list for Ada 202X
References: <7f1c01c5-3563-4b94-9831-152dbbf2ecdc@googlegroups.com>
 <206rutb9pqak$.11a3dufqvmrm4.dlg@40tude.net> <lgu52g$hsc$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <1idv9jmp46s4s.a5imrixhtsn3.dlg@40tude.net>
 <2fe6c4c0-c66b-4857-a92e-b8978aa5f2f1@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <2fe6c4c0-c66b-4857-a92e-b8978aa5f2f1@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <5332ee09$0$4217$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Mar 2014 16:11:05 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9d1e3665.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=97?JdGJID6KFJ3]dH>I?oEA9EHlD; 3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA^;
 5]aA^R6>BE5X:M?P8E3Fnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jM^ai`bVL; YaM
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
X-Original-Bytes: 1678
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:185354
Date: 2014-03-26T16:11:05+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 26.03.14 11:30, Marius Amado-Alves wrote:
> So my whish for Ada 202X is: no Ada 202X, please.
> It's time for a new, good, unpopular language.

Parallel loops are on the way, I guess, so something is
to come.

Other than these, language profiles can help, too!

Some examples:
- no public "access" (subp-pointers excluded?)
- no anonymous types,
- tasking restrictions less severe that RavenSPARK,
...