From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++ vs. Ada: Which language is more strongly typed?
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 01:14:06 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <532698667.549763969.594102.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
References: <pes42m$v13$4@dont-email.me>
 <09ddd19e-bddd-45a2-84f0-0145f85d95cd@googlegroups.com>
 <87vaaz1lhu.fsf@nightsong.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7g1xAi69fD1aacr2pkK7Yw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q4ilCxFPHTWEd4CfrWRjbr8GZvY=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52896
Date: 2018-06-04T01:14:06+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Lucretia <> writes:
>>> http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2014/04/17/c-vs-ada-which-language-is-more-strongly-typed/
>> 
>> You've actually posted something useful.
> 
> Bah, that article was useless imho.  It says C++ is less strongly typed

I agree the article is total bollocks, but I was indicating that I was
amazed he posted something better than his usual shite.