From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11390f,be6b7e036aa9236c
X-Google-Attributes: gid11390f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10261c,68666e29d0425009
X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,be6b7e036aa9236c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be6b7e036aa9236c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fa0ae,be6b7e036aa9236c
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa0ae,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,be6b7e036aa9236c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1164ba,be6b7e036aa9236c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1164ba,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,68666e29d0425009
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
From: jmccarty@sun1307.spd.dsccc.com (Mike McCarty)
Subject: Re: Results of my test: Re: Friday 13th, try it yourself
Date: 1996/10/01
Message-ID: <52ru26$k4o@sun001.spd.dsccc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 186545809
references: <5bxuvOAdKcSyEwne@merlyn.demon.co.uk>
 <Pine.SOL.3.91.960926130011.17641E-100000@serv1.jump.net>
 <52hb32$ns5@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>
organization: DSC Communications Corporation
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.apl,comp.lang.basic,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.pascal.misc,comp.lang.smalltalk
Date: 1996-10-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <52hb32$ns5@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>,
CHI Research, Inc.  <chirsrch@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
)In <Pine.SOL.3.91.960926130011.17641E-100000@serv1.jump.net> Lee Crites
)<adonai@jump.net> writes: 
)>
)>
)
)[snip]
)
)>
)>However, the results are no different.  Basically, the 13th falls 
)>uniformily across each day of the week.
)>
)>       Sun found  687 times
)>       Mon found  685 times
)>       Tue found  685 times
)>       Wed found  687 times
)>       Thu found  684 times
)>       Fri found  688 times
)>       Sat found  684 times
)>     error found    0 times
)>
)>
)
)Something is really wrong here.  The results show the opposite of the
)poster's conclusions.  No?
)
)Dom Olivastro


NO! They show remarkable agreement with a constant distribution with the
expected value 685.7 indeed.

Mik
-- 
----
char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}

I don't speak for DSC.         <- They make me say that.