From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How come Ada isn't more popular? Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:32:24 +0100 Message-ID: <52geq5F1obf3nU1@mid.individual.net> References: <1169636785.504223.139630@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <45b8361a_5@news.bluewin.ch> <3pejpgfbki.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net xscael4y03VY8BQeOy6jwg8b9KZfznVErz0Szu9Obo7gsfcMc= User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8839 Date: 2007-02-02T10:32:24+01:00 List-Id: Maciej Sobczak wrote: > Markus E Leypold wrote: > >>>> But from what I remember in >>>> the 1997s to 1998s >>> Most programming languages were terrible at that time, that's true. >> >> Not Ada 95 ... :-). > > Ada 95 *is* terrible. It doesn't have containers nor unbounded strings > and it cannot even return limited types from functions. Yuck! ;-) Well, well, it *has* unbounded strings, you bad guy! ;) > (snip)