From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.7.50 with SMTP id 38mr58678487yho.0.1416086495894; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.37.83 with SMTP id q77mr10944qgq.7.1416086495847; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:21:35 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u7no1915785qaz.1!news-out.google.com!w7ni0qay.0!nntp.google.com!w8no81325qac.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:21:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.111.77.1; posting-account=Ies7ywoAAACcdHZMiIRy0M84lcJvfxwg NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.111.77.1 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <52f050b4-b239-4e20-962a-c1d7231183a8@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: software metrics From: brbarkstrom@gmail.com Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:21:35 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23393 Date: 2014-11-15T13:21:35-08:00 List-Id: On Saturday, November 15, 2014 2:40:44 PM UTC-5, Brian Drummond wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 06:24:30 -0800, brbarkstrom wrote: > > > >> > >> Thank you all, > >> Patrizia > >> > >> > >> > > You might take a look at Barry Boehm's books on Software Cost Estimation > > [the classic is Software Engineering Economics, 1981; the newer version > > is Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, 2000]. > > As the question was asked in 1995, the latter book may not have been > published yet... Don't know what happened there, perhaps Google Groups > archive struck again... > > - Brian Quite right - for the first question. On the other hand, there are a couple from Aug. 19 if the e-mail dates are correct. Can't win 'em all. Bruce b.