From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f05f6c2ca4c91ddd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: frank@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu (Frank Manning) Subject: Re: long term viability of Ada Date: 1996/09/26 Message-ID: <52eltk$jha@news.ccit.arizona.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 185528255 references: <324219D1.15FFEF33@bright.net> <524sb9$t5g@lex.zippo.com> <529n5f$k68@news.ccit.arizona.edu> <529vd7$h9l@lex.zippo.com> organization: College of Engineering and Mines, University of Arizona newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <529vd7$h9l@lex.zippo.com> nasser@apldbio.com writes: >In article <529n5f$k68@news.ccit.arizona.edu>, frank@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu >says... > >> I question whether you can >> draw any valid conclusions on this subject by studying classified ads. >> > > Really? If you see 1000 ads asking for skill A, and 1 asking for skill B, > are you saying I can't draw any conclusion from this? You can draw the conclusion that 1000 ads are asking for skill A and one is asking for skill B. Beyond that, what? Does that tell me there are 1000 times as many workers using skill A compared to skill B? No. The ratio may be greater or less than 1000. Maybe by a large amount. Who knows? -- Frank Manning -- Chair, AIAA-Tucson Section