From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,d00514eb0749375b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Britt Snodgrass <britt.snodgrass@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: initialize an array (1-D) at elaboration using an expression
 based on the index?
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <52d9abdb-34a2-4b9c-80e5-823b11571e93@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
References: <i9amkr$goj$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <op.vkm4yasm0k3wt7@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <4b8f7f06-a817-4545-9fc6-67740c67b9d3@a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.175.225.24
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1287506084 2627 127.0.0.1 (19 Oct 2010 16:34:44
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:34:44 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.175.225.24;
 posting-account=rdRzuwoAAAAyW3CSBhs_xgfCUJSc1aNt
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 secproxy04.rockwellcollins.com:8080 (IWSS)
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR
 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:15592
Date: 2010-10-19T09:34:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Oct 15, 7:16=A0pm, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:

> perhaps I'll propose it for the next version of Ada (what is that
> going to be? =A0Ada 2020, where we add all the features that we realize
> in hindsight that we should have added earlier? :-)).
>

Ada 2020!  I had the same thought a couple of days ago. That's a name
that would catch on. And hopefully by then there will be more than one
vendor who's motivated to implement the current standard.