From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a802:: with SMTP id w2mr3510096qva.80.1584527227348;
        Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d553:: with SMTP id m80mr2618344oig.30.1584527227074;
 Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <r4rs1l$9bu$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.107.155.10;
 posting-account=XfA3zgkAAABoz6fRf3Tehtnqqr7Ycml-
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.107.155.10
References: <6bcc6133-8c8b-4252-a8e6-fd64a5eec2ca@googlegroups.com>
 <r4p8md$otc$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <r4qbs8$192$1@dont-email.me>
 <r4rs1l$9bu$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <52d51195-fa25-4271-bc48-3f8b63812302@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Good/best way to enforce library-level instantiation a generic
 package
From: Vincent Marciante <vincent.marciante@l3harris.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:27:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58216
Date: 2020-03-18T03:27:06-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 at 9:03:51 PM UTC-4, Randy Brukardt wrote:
=20
> That would reject an instance in a library-level child package, which=20
> probably isn't what the OP wants.
>=20
>                 Randy.

Correct: I would want to instantiate into a library-level package, includin=
g a child.  I just want to avoid repeated execution of elaboration code of =
an instance and have any such arrangement that would cause that be at least=
 flagged/warned at compile-time.