From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6d1607a5397de6b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Love Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ in defense projects Date: 2000/11/04 Message-ID: <52B54391C48CD3FA.DBEE8ACDD43DE98B.F85BB1C76BD84BCD@lp.airnews.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 689691480 Sender: rlove@smtp.neosoft.com References: <39FDE9E4.35F615A6@netwood.net> <39FE461D.275F1363@ix.netcom.com> <8tmt7o$vbj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A02DB88.8A4232D1@lmco.com> X-Orig-Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Time: Sat Nov 4 13:56:02 2000 Organization: PDQ.net (using Airnews.net!) NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library1-aux.airnews.net Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at pdq.net to report improper postings Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-11-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Stimson writes: Jeff> My God. Is everyone blind to the inherent dangers in Jeff> programming with C++ ? My last project in Ada (about 20K Jeff> SLOC) was delivered to the customer about 8 months ago with Jeff> no defects. That's zero, zip, 0, nadda. We have heard Jeff> nothing back from them in terms of problems or bugs. I know Jeff> for a fact that the current project (approx same size) in Jeff> C++ will not turn out the same. Don't tell us, tell your customer. Yeah, I know you don't go talking bad about mgmt decisions to the cusotmer but you can find ways to point this out so the customer uncovers this himself. -- ============================================================= | Support Signature Minimalism | =============================================================