From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,be9bf965710b207c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-18 17:30:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: mjsilva@jps.net (Mike Silva) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: official recommendations of Ada Date: 18 Jul 2001 17:30:20 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5267be60.0107181630.2814fa72@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.239.198.143 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 995502620 970 127.0.0.1 (19 Jul 2001 00:30:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jul 2001 00:30:20 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10221 Date: 2001-07-19T00:30:20+00:00 List-Id: hfrumblefoot@yahoo.com (Hambut) wrote in message news:... > A final point worth noting is that if everything goes horribly wrong > and you have to go 'C' then I understand that it's well worth looking > at: > > o The MISRA 'C' Guidelines, and > o "Safer C" by Les Hatton > > According to people 'in the know' both of these are supposed to have > valuable tips for developing safer 'C' software. > > Later, > Hambut FWIW, the MISRA 'C' Guidelines intend their C subset for SIL 2 & 3, but make no recommendation for SIL 4. I guess you could count that as a negative recommendation for C (and by implication C++) Mike Mike