From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TRACKER_ID,
	UNCLOSED_BRACKET autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:43:01 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: library/binding for sftp?
References: 
 <85li4gmhrt.fsf@stephe-leake.org><2wgl8bcmdsu0$.1rs1604fzwufv.dlg@40tude.net><85vc3jfias.fsf@stephe-leake.org><1gwg87tgm2bo7$.ae7440ka6kmc.dlg@40tude.net><85bo59g6h7.fsf@stephe-leake.org><ul3xotcxb4wh$.1rfdfqdzhndf.dlg@40tude.net><kttvbd$jp7$1@dont-email.me><bccmiwywovsc.1gr3p41feupbk$.dlg@40tude.net><5987935c-dbce-4602-b0e6-2bb85513588b@googlegroups.com><9oo34px7j5ko$.1j7bcnxwzgcxe.dlg@40tude.net><ef5ac77e-14b7-4328-8b7f-0db73020cee5@googlegroups.com><20130808111404.5fc6ce14@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se><1nfcrgjw8vkrb.1aukq12ys882l$.dlg@40tude.net><20130808133709.09dfef98@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se><ku0qti$6nr$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <20130809104904.6ca91de2@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>
 <ku3ig5$9ml$1@loke.gir.dk> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1308191900320.24091@debian>
 <kuu8uc$n86$1@loke.gir.dk>
In-Reply-To: <kuu8uc$n86$1@loke.gir.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <52130ff0$0$6552$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Aug 2013 08:42:56 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6a2f5dd7.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=n0nBke8jMh2n`gW2MTm]<34IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;
 TUUbab]\[C<nc\616M64>:Lh>_cHTX3j=j<FkgBFE\[9
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
X-Original-Bytes: 2736
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183082
Date: 2013-08-20T08:42:56+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 20.08.13 01:15, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> If you truly are using only "unknown protocols", then you're by definition
> using a private wired connection, and clearly only a determined attacker
> would have access to that. And there is no defense against such attackers;
> the most you can do is annoy them enough that hopefully they'll look for an
> easier target.

This view surely phrases protection using ciphers as protection
using physical privacy... and presupposes hackers' determinations,
as might have been the case of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiNotar . As can be concluded from
the case, physical measures have not prevented ensuing bankruptcy!

I'll offer 10,-€ (yes, that's little in view of your average incomes,
but is worth some beer) for solving this unknown protocol.

SYN1Bo3AHS7SYO3FP9FXN1H7CEK1eR

__
<smallprint>Professional cryptographers, please refrain from
acting quickly.</smallprint>