From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 13:41:00 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_L=F8cke?= <thomas@12boo.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130629 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Web Development Using Ada?
References: <874bf843-8212-44a4-b0c6-e20d831325bc@googlegroups.com>
 <51F92827.5000903@obry.net>
 <51f95d3a$0$14311$afc38c87@news7.united-newsserver.de>
 <51F97BA8.9040401@obry.net>
 <51f9e7e6$0$5337$afc38c87@news6.united-newsserver.de>
 <87vc3po7uj.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <51fac5e9$0$13438$afc38c87@news6.united-newsserver.de>
 <878v0g1q36.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
In-Reply-To: <878v0g1q36.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <51ff8f4c$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.48.41.194
X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk
 DXC=4^Bc6d<6IA5H=<af7\E>^0YSB=nbEKnk;6]W0W?WhFk<3ZOKe3?:>X1=62O<n?ZNn?DEjcHb:<8^2Lc5\aIB1:>=
X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16678
Date: 2013-08-05T13:41:00+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 08/05/2013 10:47 AM, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:

> Also; AWS consistently beats node.js, which supposedly is the fastest
> existing web framework (http://wiki.ada-dk.org/aws_vs_node.js).  Testing
> AWS or node.js against other web frameworks, such as Ruby on Rails shows
> orders of magnitude speed differences.  So you have to have quite heavy
> applications or quite large user bases to actually need more than one
> server for performance.


It is quite a while ago that test was done, and since then node.js has
both caught up and surpassed AWS.

That does not mean AWS is slow, but saying it is faster than node.js is
a stretch. It _was_ faster, in a very simple test.  :)

Just to make that clear.

-- 
Thomas Løcke | thomas@12boo.net | http://12boo.net