From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a4156f047b063f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: onox Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Forcing Exception Handling Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:33:33 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <51b5a53a-ae73-4435-8004-2ec4574b773c@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com> References: <02901b13-da72-48ae-9cb3-bf1a10144c44@u3g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.139.123.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298918013 1892 127.0.0.1 (28 Feb 2011 18:33:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.139.123.5; posting-account=BtkjvAoAAADwEquGb07eykXfyiDMOxfl User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/9.0.597.45 Safari/534.13,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18615 Date: 2011-02-28T10:33:33-08:00 List-Id: On Feb 28, 6:32=A0pm, Simon Clubley wrote: > On 2011-02-28, iloAda wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > I was wondering if there is a way in Ada to force exception handling. > > For instance, if there is a call to a function that may raise an > > exception, force the caller to handle that exception. > > What's wrong with the raise statement ? > > (Or have I not understood what it is you are after ?) > > Simon. > > -- > Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP > Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world I think he means that certain exceptions must be catched somewhere, like Java does.