From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4ce0ea7d497db907 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: sjw Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: anonymous access type Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:03:23 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <51889345-8760-4804-b706-36a436810719@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.20.239.213 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1236114204 24646 127.0.0.1 (3 Mar 2009 21:03:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.20.239.213; posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_6; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.27.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.2.1 Safari/525.27.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4877 Date: 2009-03-03T13:03:23-08:00 List-Id: On Mar 3, 12:25=A0pm, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > Now, being a good citizen, I would like to explicitly stress that the > parameter is passed 'in' instead of relying on implicit mode, so let's > add the 'in' keyword where it belongs: Personally I find the 'in' keyword annoying and a waste of 3 characters! Rather like initialising an object of an access type with ":=3D null". Your mileage obviously varies ...