From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,170b136bef612224
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.88.200 with SMTP id b8mr22744810qam.8.1367665236463;
        Sat, 04 May 2013 04:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 y6ni7347qax.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!nrc-news.nrc.ca!News.Dal.Ca!citadel.nobulus.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Specifying a target in a GPRBuild project file?
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:45:01 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <517B81FD.8000100@obry.net>
References: <op.wvzg7oa2ule2fv@cardamome> <op.wvzh99e4ule2fv@cardamome>
 <op.wvzrxcetule2fv@cardamome> <op.wvzyps0pule2fv@cardamome>
 <op.wvz13t1fule2fv@cardamome>
 <8f5e2358-05ab-4b0f-82be-b2f2d7438765@googlegroups.com>
 <op.wv290uimule2fv@cardamome> <51796066.5060906@obry.net>
 <1jpdzc49i9m1w.12yp9l8whf5lk$.dlg@40tude.net> <517AA6C1.7050508@obry.net>
 <1hdsodgh31xt9$.1ua65srkn4jrx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <a542579c-b061-45e3-8359-23b45282f9b7@googlegroups.com>
 <lzwyp7udwku6$.1o8ezwjibj3v8.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: KMOsx35cI/C1UVZUrQuUkg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr-FR;
 rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2013-04-27T09:45:01+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Dmitry,

> I don't use *.cgpr stuff. So far I see no compelling reasons to start using
> it. Project files are complicated enough without another layer of tools,
> which purpose is unclear to me.

Right, you don't but gprbuild does and this is most of the transparent
to users.

> If anything useful could be done automatically, why gnatmake/gnat etc does
> not do that already? Maybe because it is not so awfully useful? (:-))

Because gnatmake is for Ada only whereas gprbuild supports building
applications with multiple languages. The gprbuild knowledge base is
quite impressive, I don't understand you'll want to *not* benefit from it?

Pascal.

-- 
  Pascal Obry /  Magny Les Hameaux (78)

  The best way to travel is by means of imagination

  http://v2p.fr.eu.org
  http://www.obry.net

  gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B