From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.software-eng:1180 comp.lang.ada:2085
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!kth!enea!maxim!prc
From: prc@maxim.ERBE.SE (Robert Claeson)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Good Design Strategies <Was comments on comments>
Summary: In what way is Eiffel a flaky language?
Message-ID: <517@maxim.ERBE.SE>
Date: 28 Feb 89 12:22:42 GMT
References: <4343@enea.se> <4574@hubcap.UUCP>
Organization: ERBE DATA AB
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bill,

In article <4574@hubcap.UUCP>, you write:

>    I stand by my statement regarding Eiffel's flakiness.  Obviously 
>    it's just my opinion, and others may differ, but I think it's a 
>    very well-founded opinion.

Can you please elaborate on that? I'm sure there are quite a few people
around who wants to know in what ways Eiffel is flaky.

-- 
Robert Claeson, ERBE DATA AB, P.O. Box 77, S-175 22 Jarfalla, Sweden
Tel: +46 (0)758-202 50  Fax: +46 (0)758-197 20
EUnet:   rclaeson@ERBE.SE               uucp:   {uunet,enea}!erbe.se!rclaeson
ARPAnet: rclaeson%ERBE.SE@uunet.UU.NET  BITNET: rclaeson@ERBE.SE