From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3e9e2e402ed75bc3 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 X-Received: by 10.180.20.105 with SMTP id m9mr18373438wie.5.1366703144442; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Path: p18ni15792wiv.0!nntp.google.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:45:43 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGhvbWFzIEzDuGNrZQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: aws vs ruby rails or php? how much faster? References: <87vc7fm3lp.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <517627a4$0$32104$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <51763c27$0$32114$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.48.41.194 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=FcefcO]X0AiN2]LRcf6HDcYSB=nbEKnkkSEha^;4YQRn1GQX8;5?CngRED9SjB8:6iIoAl0m>UN:anE6W6fTmjaiT1MLbPdK;Cd X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2013-04-23T09:45:43+02:00 List-Id: On 04/23/2013 09:10 AM, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote: > I wonder if this kind of benchmark really tells anything (the one with > AWS vs Node.js). It does say one thing: AWS is not slow. What I set out to do was to show that it is not necessarily slow to use threads, as the node.js people claimed it would be. AWS handles a whole slew of connections just fine. Besides that, this test doesn't really tell anything about anything. :o) -- Thomas Løcke | thomas@12boo.net | http://12boo.net