From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e9e2e402ed75bc3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Received: by 10.180.212.113 with SMTP id nj17mr10242837wic.7.1366700115244;
        Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 hg5ni15540wib.1!nntp.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.astraweb.com!border5.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:55:13 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_L=F8cke?= <thomas@12boo.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: aws vs ruby rails or php? how much faster?
References: <cb0c69fa-3393-4bbf-88af-0399057226f7@googlegroups.com>
 <87vc7fm3lp.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <op.wvyn3phdule2fv@cardamome>
 <517627a4$0$32104$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <b9cd8339-f151-48ce-a276-7f668d645014@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <b9cd8339-f151-48ce-a276-7f668d645014@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <51763051$0$32114$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.48.41.194
X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk
 DXC=L7Y`_Y^^gJOGal0:\7MlDHYSB=nbEKnkKSEha^;4YQRN1GQX8;5?CnGRED9SjB8:6IIoAl0m>UN:Akk>`h32]mmD4>6B]=RkIgG
X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2013-04-23T08:55:13+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 04/23/2013 08:45 AM, johannes falcone wrote:
> If node.js is faster then why doesn't everyone use node.js?
> In a nutshell is javascript enough to program a dynamic website?
> What do you think of aolserver or naviserver vs aws?


Speed isn't everything Johannes. If I need to serve 100 request
per second, and my chosen platform can do 150, then I no longer
need to worry about performance. I can focus on more important
things, such as security, stability, modularity, safety and
the general functionality of the application.

Since it is much easier to write safe, secure and stable code in
Ada compared to something like Javascript/PHP, the choice of Ada
is a no-brainer to me. Node.js might be faster, but it relies on
an inherently horrible programming language that is prone to errors
and _very_ hard to maintain when the application grows beyond a few
thousand lines.

I don't know anything about aolserver and naviserver, so I can't
comment on those.

:o)

-- 
Thomas L�cke | thomas@12boo.net | http://12boo.net