From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,73cb216d191f0fef
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.217.195 with SMTP id hn3mr11061605qab.5.1366380615071;
        Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ef9ni4649qab.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!News.Dal.Ca!news.litech.org!news.etla.org!poup.poupinou.org!news.muarf.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:10:18 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this expected behavior or not
References: <c988e09f-8532-4840-9749-b61aa39551b4@googlegroups.com>
 <wdlyfbnwcnp7.10c9btwjmpm7j.dlg@40tude.net> <kivi42$hmu$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <cqf0yy6q930$.1sdzw45bc0c1w.dlg@40tude.net> <kj2e90$9iu$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <byacn0wck9qt$.norrlukaw80l$.dlg@40tude.net> <kj5cqn$8q7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1gnmajx2fdjju.1bo28xwmzt1nr.dlg@40tude.net> <kjd9ec$6lr$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <3gv2jwc95otm.pl2aahsh9ox8.dlg@40tude.net> <kjfk1t$38n$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1gkxiwepaxvtt$.u3ly33rbwthf.dlg@40tude.net> <kjig2j$nof$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1fmcdkj58brky.bjedt0pr39cd$.dlg@40tude.net> <kjknuu$gc8$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1bj564vat3q1j$.1s4d00rlzx4ux$.dlg@40tude.net> <kjnt9t$ia$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <igo6blwn0oas$.wifvpq91hm9m.dlg@40tude.net> <kk27vf$uco$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <8bj2k30k7i19.w7ehsldwbf7x.dlg@40tude.net> <kk4ns0$7b7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1o34nhpfuy6yl$.2orlukd1elr7.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <1o34nhpfuy6yl$.2orlukd1elr7.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <51669a0d$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2013 13:10:05 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86c698d0.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=QGSN2XciUYB2:OR3:3gaE@4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKhn@@Y2U:<lNPCY\c7>ejVHm5[35<ZAH4B7JhRgAoB?CH
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2013-04-11T13:10:05+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11.04.13 09:59, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>> You don't make language design dependent and promoting bad practices.
>> >
>> >If you are starting with a blank page, you're right. If you are building on
>> >30+ years of practice, even "bad practice" has to be taken into account.

> Nonsense. Bad practice is bad. Longer it lasts bigger is the damage.

The consultancy business might be damaged as well when the language
becomes simpler. Or maybe not?