From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcnc!gatech!cuae2!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!smu!spray
From: spray@smu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: pd Ada Compiler
Message-ID: <51500005@smu>
Date: Tue, 20-Jan-87 01:28:00 EST
Article-I.D.: smu.51500005
Posted: Tue Jan 20 01:28:00 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Jan-87 00:22:24 EST
References: <183@cideq3.CIDNET.COM>
Nf-ID: #R:cideq3.CIDNET.COM:183:smu:51500005:000:347
Nf-From: smu!spray    Jan 20 00:28:00 1987
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Someone posted a Note, referring to Ada/Ed-C as a public-domain
Ada compiler. Now most of my information refers to the old SETL Ada/Ed
interpreter, but it all has Copyright notices plastered all over
the place. Has the situation changed with Ada/Ed-C or is someone
misunderstanding something?

Rob Spray
...!convex!smu!spray
spray%smu@csnet-relay