From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!yetti!geac!len
From: len@geac.UUCP (Leonard Vanek)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Compiler Evaluations
Message-ID: <514@geac.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Feb-87 13:22:12 EST
Article-I.D.: geac.514
Posted: Mon Feb  2 13:22:12 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 2-Feb-87 18:44:45 EST
Organization: GEAC Computers, Toronto, CANADA
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


A couple of weeks ago I posted a request for evaluations of
the Telegen 2 and VADS Ada development systems and promised
to summarize the results to the net (in a manner similar to
many surveys in the UUCP network.) As a result, I have learned
two things:

1. I found that comp.lang.ada is bidirectionally gatewayed to the DoD
   Internet mailing list INFO-ADA. Although use of INFO-ADA for
   requesting such information is not inappropriate, posting of any
   summaries is discouraged where the results can be construed as
   possible recommendations on the part of the Department of Defense. I
   have been advised to provide summaries via private mail to those who
   request them of me.

2  I received very few responses, so the results of my poll are
   inconclusive in any case.


Len Vanek