From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f891f,239ebd1fd5147e24,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f8bb08246869e998 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen) Subject: Re: Language wars (6th September) Date: 1996/09/10 Message-ID: <5140ec$g9b@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 179722779 distribution: inet references: <50p9ir$cn4@pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk> <967cc$112c6.322@NEWS> <9075.imc@comlab.ox.ac.uk> organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <9075.imc@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, imc@ecs.ox.ac.uk (Ian Collier) writes: > |OK, I'll bite. What is "Orwell", beside my favorite English author? > > A functional language, closely related to Miranda and Gofer. > > For example: > > > factorial x = x, if x<3 > > = x*factorial(x-1), otherwise Well, there certainly is something Orwellian about asserting that 0! = 0. > This whole article is an Orwell program, because lines not starting with ">" > are comments. Until it gets quoted in another article! :-) -- Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com