From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f7344,3307180c36b2ddde X-Google-Attributes: gidf7344,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,818bb9686cf8adae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Uri Raz Subject: Re: Dec Ditching Ada? Date: 1996/09/10 Message-ID: <513a9r$10na@ilx018.iil.intel.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 179894703 references: <1996Sep5.092514.1@eisner> <1996Sep6.091045.1@eisner> <50qkqh$f1o@news.nyu.edu> <3231CA5D.67B1@iag.net> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Intel Corp. x-url: news:dewar.842131187@schonberg mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vms x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; AIX 2) Date: 1996-09-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Guys (& girls - are you there ? :-), I doesnt seem to me like the issue is anything about who owns the compiler, whether payments goes for support or developement, or anything the like. The issue is about two questions : 1. Is the GNAT a good Ada compiler ? (= is software X worthy of use ?) 2. Does support give the bang for the bucks, and will continue to do so in the future ? As the first question is ignored in this thread, I think it boils down to the second - would GNAT users get their money's worth of support or not. The arguments claiming that the software's & support's quality having to do anything with where the money goes are vacuum thin - people might do good job for free, or bad job for good money, and payment might always cover non product related expenses (taxes, delivery, company overheads, whatever). One should check what he gets and what he pays. Idly philosophising about legal intricacies and money distribution wouldnt get anyone anywhere. Uri Raz. +---------+--------------------+-------+-----+-----+ | Uri Raz | uraz@iil.intel.com | Noir | :-) | :-( | | All opinions are mine. Others may share them. | +--------------------------------------------------+