From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,6458d1ee91b224ec
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.68.235.173 with SMTP id un13mr622552pbc.3.1360549061907;
        Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:17:41 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 mj10ni3481pbb.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!news.stw-bonn.de!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:19:32 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: chopping Ada source that have preprocessor symbols in them
References: <5111a9d5$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <85txpnm1vp.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
In-Reply-To: <85txpnm1vp.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Message-ID: <5114fb61$0$6561$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Feb 2013 14:19:30 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6cfd2087.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=6QooeKSc>EQ@>[RYkFXOIP4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[5QcE1AObAS\nc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]e<SKblW3gH_
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
X-Original-Bytes: 1810
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2013-02-08T14:19:30+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 08.02.13 13:22, Stephen Leake wrote:
> Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> writes:
> 
>> - I call gnatprep with the original program as input and use
>>   the output as input to gnatchop. I loose the preprocessor
>>    symbols in all resulting compilation units,
> 
> What's wrong with this option?

When I want to use GNAT's file based approach, *and* also want to
continue preprocessing with GNATprep or gcc in order to handle
different configurations/language support/..., then I need the
symbols to stay in the chopped source. After this step, I could use
-gnatep or Makefile rules as necessary.