From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b47b15fda2aeb0b2,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dulman@ibm.net Subject: Re:Two ideas for the next Ada Standard Date: 1996/08/31 Message-ID: <50aao3$3r88@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 177701559 reply-to: dulman@ibm.net newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: As began debate concerning future of the language standard, I would like to do some remarks to future ADA-0x. 1. ALIASED is more common notion then RENAMES and (it seams to me) this key word needn't. 2. OUT parameters have such chances as IN OUT 3. Maybe for calling entry in SELECT statement with DELAY to write in the form : (...) WITH DELAY [UNTIL]