From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2078ce7aac45af5b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Received: by 10.66.83.5 with SMTP id m5mr133481pay.33.1352982113295;
        Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:21:53 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 6ni82927pbd.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:21:52 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada202X : Adding functors
References: <0114d327-9f9f-4ad2-9281-56331d11a90c@googlegroups.com>
 <e33b09e3-7840-42d0-886b-8cf1ec7bf9d3@googlegroups.com>
 <d05679f7-58dc-415b-a22a-dc9f032b1b17@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <d05679f7-58dc-415b-a22a-dc9f032b1b17@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <50a4de60$0$9508$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Nov 2012 13:21:52 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 57b89656.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=0Ni3FYYlcY6RLigj];iP=8ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1nkgeX?EC@@0JkkRih[6<O=PCY\c7>ejV8aBLPQ78TOe=V>BDc@b2?3;
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-11-15T13:21:52+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 15.11.12 08:12, Martin wrote:
> Yup...I think I listed lambdas in another post...possibly even my 'No 1'! No chance of me using them in my C++ work, our compilers aren't up to C++11.
>

Does the capturing mechanism allow returning lambda-expressions
outliving their declarative region, i.e. can they be returned?

I noticed this when boldly trying to make sense of the draft standard:

// 22 [Note: If an entity is implicitly or explicitly captured by
//  reference, invoking the function call operator of the
//  corresponding lambda-Expression after the lifetime of the entity
//  has ended is likely to result in undefined behavior. �endnote]