From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site se-sd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!se-sd!mag
From: mag@se-sd.UUCP (mag)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: OTHER ACVCs CONTINUED
Message-ID: <50@se-sd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Apr-86 11:36:29 EST
Article-I.D.: se-sd.50
Posted: Tue Apr 15 11:36:29 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Apr-86 18:48:52 EST
Reply-To: mag@se-sd.UUCP ()
Distribution: na
Organization: NCR Corporation, SE - San Diego
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I am also in need of ANY reasonably-sized Ada  tests that can be used to
help evaluate the quality of a given compiler above and beyond the ACVC
test suite.  My goal is to acquire a set of tests that can be used to
determine if a compiler is of production quality.  My quest for Ada code
has taken me as far as the Ada Repository where I was disappointed to
learn that the majority of tools are not written in Ada, but in PASCAL or
C.  Any help finding some test would be appreciated.

-- Mike Georgantos