From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.224.5.5 with SMTP id 5mr8936712qat.4.1380286512048; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 05:55:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.104.83 with SMTP id gc19mr28575qeb.12.1380286511266; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 05:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ek7no97432qab.0!news-out.google.com!9ni404qaf.0!nntp.google.com!q9no42281qas.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 05:55:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59377480-56c1-402d-8708-8610e5a11d7b@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.59.203.113; posting-account=7Oy7OQoAAABhVYFOo553Cn1-AaU-bSfl NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.59.203.113 References: <62fd156b-0be2-4465-aeba-287ec9ce22e0@googlegroups.com> <59377480-56c1-402d-8708-8610e5a11d7b@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5089c658-be04-4fcc-ab3d-0dc52d04c935@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Gnat's Handling of Record with Address Clause From: Eryndlia Mavourneen Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:55:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Bytes: 2197 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183485 Date: 2013-09-27T05:55:11-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, September 26, 2013 3:00:30 PM UTC-5, Shark8 wrote: > On Thursday, September 26, 2013 8:23:36 AM UTC-6, Eryndlia Mavourneen wro= te: >=20 > > Local_Buffer : My_Buffer_T with Address =3D> Local_Buffer_A= ddr; >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hm, I think you might be able to get around the one error with an Import = [and perhaps Convention] aspect. Thanks, Shark8, but I already have it working using the (holds nose) altern= ate method of address-access conversion. :-) Mainly, I just needed a demo to show myself that it is possible to use a pr= ocedure access type that is defined in a separate package. Gnat's failure = to fully implement the dynamic "with Address" clause/pragma plus the rules = on using access types really made the code more complicated than I believe = is necessary. -- Eryndlia (KK1T)