From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,16e06ab8237bab07
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.86.98 with SMTP id o2mr8317425paz.29.1351478423424;
        Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 s9ni66479pbb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:59:42 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this a bug in Ada.Numerics?
References: <8391f2d1-b4c7-4b12-bc16-1419a1aa9739@googlegroups.com>
 <87wqykd1wv.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <0360d84c-ef42-4107-b837-4063da273ad8@googlegroups.com>
 <87r4oscx42.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
In-Reply-To: <87r4oscx42.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
Message-ID: <5083b97c$0$6635$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Oct 2012 10:59:40 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: cacad506.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=OYmlWJ5e7]:T2Rfi6<W9f5A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;<A`J>alo?o?PCY\c7>ejV8]Qg\^U`I`e=7i;U?jV7lh1
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-10-21T10:59:40+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 21.10.12 05:39, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> These rules are quite subtle and the error messages from GNAT less than
> helpful.  Maybe that's why Ada has a reputation for being "difficult to
> learn".

With GNAT, try adding

  -gnatwh turn on warnings for hiding declarations

(Perusing the list of compiler switches once in a while keeps being
very useful.)