From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Fixed Point number mul, is it a bug?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:34:26 +0200
Date: 2012-10-18T12:34:26+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507fdb32$0$6641$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wac2fm8hf0h7$.du8cji1kw1bw$.dlg@40tude.net>
On 18.10.12 09:57, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> A binary fixed point type has values which
> are not necessarily exact decimal ones. In RM's language it would read as
> "the small" is not a power of 10.
And if GNAT is with -gnatwa (all warnings), it will mention the issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 7:11 Fixed Point number mul, is it a bug? kylix
2012-10-18 7:35 ` Vinzent Höfler
2012-10-18 14:49 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-10-19 9:09 ` AdaMagica
2012-10-18 7:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-10-18 10:34 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2012-10-18 10:42 ` Ian Clifton
2012-10-18 12:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-10-19 22:58 ` Ian Clifton
2012-10-18 14:40 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-10-18 14:04 ` Shark8
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox