From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,429176cb92b1b825 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Shark8 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AWS Coding Styles (and about boring plain-linear text files in the end) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <50792104-a9bc-4750-853f-3281f5faef29@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com> References: <24418fa4-8843-4fe6-8c2f-026ea6009b68@g26g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <87lj2ido9j.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <4D35F6C8.2060100@obry.net> <4d3608ab$0$7664$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4d3634a5$0$7664$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4d36b748$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4d36e484$0$6769$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.172.140 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300306409 21627 127.0.0.1 (16 Mar 2011 20:13:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.172.140; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19226 Date: 2011-03-16T13:13:29-07:00 List-Id: On Mar 16, 12:28=A0pm, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) wrote: > Le Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:17:56 +0100, Georg Bauhaus =A0 > a =E9crit: > > > On 19.01.11 12:42, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) wrote: > > >> According to the authoritative FunnelWeb documentation, which you can = =A0 > >> access > >> here: > >>http://www.ross.net/funnelweb/tutorial/intro_hello.html > >> the body of a macros, whose purpose is to expand into program text, is= =A0 > >> exactly > >> the same as the one you suggested! > > > No, no, the brackets @{ @}, or the line-of-code indicator @@ are much > > simpler than FunnelWeb. =A0For one thing, the Ada programmer only needs > > to understand Ada and =A0will not think about typesetting or macros or > > line endings. > > Still in this area of annotations and rich documenting, I found another = =A0 > more or less standard which could be of interest :http://en.wikipedia.org= /wiki/Epydochttp://epydoc.sourceforge.net/http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/man= ual-fields.html > > Wikipedia says> Epydoc is a documentation generator that processes its ow= n lightweight > > markup language Epytext for Python documentation strings. As opposed to > > freeform Python docstrings, reStructured Text (both also supported) and > > other markup languages for docstrings, Epytext supports linking between > > different pieces of documentation. > > What I particularly enjoy here, is the part =93supports linking between = =A0 > different pieces of documentation=94. > > While there are multiple standards covering similar things (I would like = =A0 > one single standard, not many), there is at least one aspect which seems = =A0 > there all the time : the meaning of =93@=94 as introducing annotations. Y= ou =A0 > got it in Java, C, Python, FunnelWeb, among others. That's widely used = =A0 > enough. At least a step to something standard=85 (I still miss many and m= any =A0 > things). > > -- > Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=92est pas p= our =A0 > les chiens. > > =93I am fluent in ASCII=94 [Warren 2010] And in the TP-world '@' is the "address of" operator.