From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3432b5ee2e7ebcf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: adam@irvine.com (Adam Beneschan)
Subject: Re: ******************  Ada vs C++ Help  ********************
Date: 1996/08/30
Message-ID: <50764p$t2u@krusty.irvine.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 177505766
references: <3226aa7e.7480949@news.redstone.army.mil>
organization: /z/news/newsctl/organization
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Sarner-BA-MD@PATRIOT-ccmail.SED.Redstone.Army.Mil writes:
 >
 >Hello,  
 >
 >Does anyone know of some good papers comparing Ada 95 to C++.  

One paper I liked: "C++??, A Critique of C++", 2nd edition, by Ian Joyner:
    ftp://ftp.brown.edu/pub/c++/C++-Critique-2ed.PS 

The same web page where I found this also links to "CONTRASTS: Ada 9X
and C++", by Edmund Schonberg:
    
    ftp://ajpo.sei.cmu.edu/public/ada9x/reports/misc/9x-cplus.txt

Unfortunately, this path no longer exists, and I can't find the
report.  Does anyone know where it migrated to?  In the process of
looking for this file, I did run across another report at
ftp://ajpo.sei.cmu.edu/public/AdaIC/docs/adacplus.txt, which might be
useful. 

Hope this helps,
                                -- Adam