From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a982d4d7a7ff56a9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dweller@dfw.net (David Weller)
Subject: Re: Type qualification & entry calls - can they mix?
Date: 1996/08/30
Message-ID: <506m8l$9kb@dfw.dfw.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 177398888
references: <503itr$aij@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <503itr$aij@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>,
Dale Stanbrough  <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> wrote:
>Consider the following...
>	protected type fred is
>		entry a;
>	end fred;
>	type list is array(1..10) of fred;
>	prots :list;
>Then should the following be legal?
>	list'(prots(1)).a;
>

I believe you meant:

	fred'(prots(1)).a;

But I'm not sure why type qualification would even
be necessary in this case.

-- 
    Visit the Ada 95 Booch Components Homepage: www.ocsystems.com/booch
           This is not your father's Ada -- lglwww.epfl.ch/Ada