From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18684ed750c9b60f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.87.161 with SMTP id az1mr2774439pab.38.1349480302526;
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 t10ni23617137pbh.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 01:38:15 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to get generic formal parameter type into base class
References: <51f8461d-d362-4e5f-a188-ac96a699a211@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <51f8461d-d362-4e5f-a188-ac96a699a211@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <506f6f67$0$6547$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Oct 2012 01:38:15 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7b428f9d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=gnVEVR^<c]om7>ihJR;B_c4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkLkNlRKiA?OhPCY\c7>ejVhM^2XHRO`c`gno]IT_KM^Tg
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-10-06T01:38:15+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 06.10.12 00:23, kevin.miscellaneous@gmail.com wrote:
> This : Classes.Xlate_Base_Type'class := Factory_Get(type1);


Xlate_Base_Type is defined inside generic package
Classes.Translate_Base. Only instances Xyz of this template
allow referring to Xyz.Xlate_Base_Type['Class] elsewhere.
Like in base.Xlate_Base_Type. Classes.Xlate_Base_Type does
not exist at all, and in Classes.Translate_Base.*
"Classes.Translate_Base" is not a valid prefix for that
reason.

Just guessing, it might be helpful to _not_ associate generic
Ada packages with C++ class templates; generic packages are
as if C++ had generic _namespaces_.