From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,589fabad165a40d9
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.66.82.37 with SMTP id f5mr2229631pay.17.1348429846026;
        Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 t10ni17085432pbh.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.ripco.com!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:40:57 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_L=F8cke?= <thomas@12boo.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Tasking and timing out
References: <505ad112$0$295$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <wrv2j41zcurg$.1hkd9jrq134xf$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <505ae3a6$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <1drka4ljbi2m6$.18hcn0srcmy4v$.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <1drka4ljbi2m6$.18hcn0srcmy4v$.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <505b7f58$0$281$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.234.175.34
X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk
 DXC=nJGh2gKEUY9OVgHIS4l:13YSB=nbEKnk;cc:lZ@]ReC43ZOKe3?:>X1cAE?;m5ccY3XohdXkZjmR6imA0>JTlSQ7
X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-09-20T22:40:57+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 09/20/2012 12:21 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> #1 + #2.1.1 above. E.g. some computations, even with controlled types
> involved. Anything else requires *careful* analysis and thus is necessarily
> very fragile. Ergo, for the software design POV, it is better to forget
> about ATC, too problematic.


I've taken your advice to heart Dmitry, and re-coded the routine without
ATC, and it is much better for it.

Thank you for your help and for explaining exactly why my solution was
bad.

:)

-- 
Thomas L�cke | thomas@12boo.net | http://12boo.net